Aging workforces and
populations are a global trend. This shift calls into question the
effectiveness of prevalent human capital approaches. The graphic perfectly
illustrates the trend’s effects through 2025:

|
|

|
Flawed Succession
Planning
|
|
Only 35% of
companies conduct rigorous Succession Planning exercises and they are
"flawed" utilizing the arbitrary age of 65, and ignoring the aspirations
of incumbents for actual date of retirement and/or gradual phase down to
retirement. This will require enterprises to challenge many assumptions around
work to be done vs. time dedication
to accomplish initiatives. |
|
|
|

|
"Rear View
Mirror" Workforce Planning
|
|
The creation of a work force
plan is sporadic in most
companies and misguidedly focuses
on the question "who do
we have" instead of, "do
we have the best in the marketplace
and if not where can we secure
the necessary talent"?
NGAS research indicates the
absence of comprehensive Workforce
Planning is a huge liability
impeding business growth.
|
|

|
Compelling Need
to Align Staff with Business
Strategy
|
|
|
|
As businesses
change and position themselves
for future growth, there is
a critical need for disciplined
development of staff to manage
what are becoming more complex
environments. Companies need
to recognize that shifting demographics
and declining staff engagement
before the global
recession compels a new way
of planning for the future worker,
and workforce.
Human
Asset Sustainability
(inclusive of comprehensive
succession and workforce planning
integrated with pre-retirement
planning for executives).
|
|